Apparently I became too busy to review
every book I read after summer (or just couldn't find the
inspiration?). All I can say as an excuse is that I had a really
great semester school-wise and ballet-wise. I also tried new things
the university sport services offer and completely fell in love with
combat (which isn't going to be available next semester... *cries*).
Of course I wish reading and writing didn't have to suffer for it but
it's evident I read 34 books less than last year and wrote... well
it's harder to count since I did so much editing before this semester
but I only wrote around 30 000 words of fiction this fall. And almost
all of it during one weekend. Oh well.
I meant to continue reviewing books
anyway, so now that the year is done I thought I'd just wrap it up
with TOP 12 of 2015 (because I couldn't narrow it down to 10) in no
particular order and including comics.
Mia Vänskä
Why: Because it's horror where the
horror isn't the point. It's just very good character driven fiction
were everything is wrapped together with a horror string. You never
know where the line between psychological and magical is, you can't
be sure if it's people's traumas and personal problems or unnatural
powers from the outside that cause everything.
Recommended if:
- You'd like to read more horror but it's usually too plot driven for you
- You like to explore and understand characters' personal problems
- Horror-wise, you aren't afraid of a little bit of kitch
- The atmosphere makes the horror for you, more than action does
- (You can read Finnish ^^')
Not recommended if:
- You need a complicated mystery in horror
- You can't stand angsty characters
- The Red Head cliché sends the book flying to the wall
Keith Miller
Why: Because its fairy tale -ish style
inspired me to write some fairy tale inspired short stories I'd been
thinking of for a while. The story itself was entertaining and had
memorable moments, but what I really
fell in love with was the writing style. It's like music. Definitely
the kind of writing you forget consists of words at all.
Recommended if:
- You love fairy tales
- You like to have a lot of room for interpretation
Not recommended if:
- Poetic style puts you off
- You hate the episodic adventure structure
Helene Wecker
Why: I loved the slow pace of the
novel, I never wanted it to end. The way every side character's story
was given enough time was great, it made even infodump work,
everything was a pleasure to read. Still, the best part was the Golem
and the Djinni's journeys in learning the human ways, down to every
little detail.
Recommended if:
- You love to wander in a book's world
- You love to drown into many different characters' inner worlds
- You generally like stories where something that is ordinary to you is seen, in detail, through the eyes of someone who is unfamiliar with it
Not recommended if:
- You don't like the past to be revealed to you in flashback, bit by bit
- You often think ”get on with the plot!” when you read
Kuroko no Basket
Fujimaki Tadatoshi
Why: The games. The characters. Because
both are great and neither is compromized because they're essentially
one. Because it's hard to find a story where everything, characters,
plot, drama, comedy, seriousness and ridiculousness, is in such a
perfect balance.
Recommended if:
- You love sports manga with ridiculous abilities
- You feel at home with borderline corny/cliché when it makes sense with the characters
- You don't mind reading basically fantasy in reality disguise
- You basically read for feels...
Not recommended if:
- You read sports manga for the odd training methods more than for the games
- You can't compromize the laws of physics
- Happily Ever After puts you off
Toni Morrison
Why: It's tragic and I like it. 'nuff
said. I mean, it's so well written I couldn't put it down even though
I usually avoid too sad books because they will haunt me. Same
happened with The Bluest Eye
by the same author. It's distressing enough for the themes but not so
exhausting I don't want to see it again. And that takes talent.
Recommended if:
- You approach certain award winners with precaution because you're sensitive, but wish to read them anyway
Not recommended if:
- You often want to jump into the book to scold the characters because you'd handle their lives so much better
Alice Sebold
Why: At the beginning I was afraid I
couldn't read it because the murder was so horrible, but I soon
realized this book was full of hope, humor, understanding and
authentic characters. I'm so glad I didn't give up on it, it's
definitely in the top 3 of the year. It was just such a blissful
read. I don't seem to have anything cohesive to say about it. You
just have to read it to know.
Recommended if:
- You'd like a different viewpoint on tragedy and loss
- You're interested in the themes of thrillers/mysteries but don't often find the depth of human nature in them
Not recommended if:
- Supernatural elements make you unable to take a book ”seriously”
- You need a thriller type of conclusion to murder
Salla Simukka
Why: I find it very connected with the
classic fairy tales it's based on and with its genres' classics, and
yet it's also completely able to stand on its own. Lumikki's (Finnish
for Snow White) character is definitely the driving force and I
would've liked to read so much more about her. The interaction with
her subconscious is written unusually well.
Recommended if:
- You like fairytale symbolism
- The thrill of a thriller for you is in the character's psyche
- You like to pick up the characters' personality from small cues and details
Not recommended if:
- You read thrillers for what happens, not who it happens to
- You need a complex mystery in the external world of the story
- You don't enjoy filling in the blanks, character-wise or action-wise
Hannu Rajaniemi
Why: I don't expect a space opera type
of story to have very well developed characters, so I was prejudiced
against this book but oh my this one does. It doesn't fall short in
anything, as far as I'm concerned. It has the perfect characters,
plot, world building, societies and even all the technical details
were super interesting to me. I suppose it's because everything was
so well connected you couldn't get bored with one aspect of it if you
didn't with another.
(Oh, I'm cheating a little here
actually, I just bought the last book so I haven't read it yet...)
Recommended if:
- You love complex and detailed world building but often find it getting in the way of the story
- You like all your characters gray, and you like it obvious
- You like the narration to give you clues on how to build your own world in the story, rather than having it describe everything in the exact way you're suppose to imagine it
Not recommended if:
- Grand schemes and revelations put you off
Alan Hollinghurst
Why: I often lose my interest for a
while after every timeskip in books that have many, because I'm still
hangovering the old characters when the new ones come into the
picture. With this book everything was connected in so subtle ways
every viewpoint was equally interesting from the start! I also found
it very realistic how the characters' constructs of what happened
were based on their idea of consistency but the truth was always
scattered in all of them in ways they couldn't imagine.
Recommended if:
- You love to explore the same thing from different angles to the point were it's probably ridiculous
- You aren't inclined to lose your faith in the human race
Not recommended if:
- It irritates you to know more than the characters
- The idea that everyone is obsessed with an evening, a person, a comforting lie or some other detail for 500 pages makes you dizzy
Sarah J. Maas
Why: It's full of fantasy clichés, the
plot is hardly ever surprising, the writing is often corny especially
with all the adjectives and STILL, through the characters it all just
makes sense. The characters are people you just really need to know
because they are written so well that all the old tropes are
interesting again. This is the best YA fantasy series I've read in
years.
(Haven't read the latest book yet though.)
(Haven't read the latest book yet though.)
Recommended if:
- You're often dissapointed with YA characters but wish you weren't/ often seem to pick up fantasy books where the too straight forward plot doesn't leave room for character developement
- You love the style that effortlessly moves between serious and humorous (like Harry Potter or Percy Jackson)
- You're sick of YA heroines without personality
- You don't mind feeling like the author is trolling on the characters/ sarcastic narrative
Not recommended if:
- You need to be surprised to enjoy the plot
- You can't read cheesy scenes no matter how much sense they make
- You think deus ex machina is to be avoided at all cost
John Green, David Levithan
Why:”I'd pick you. Fuck it, I do
pick you. I want you to come over to my house in twenty years with
your dude and your adopted kids and I want our fucking kids to hang
out and I want to, like, drink wine and talk about the Middle East or
whatever the fuck we're gonna want to do when we're old. We've been
friends too long to pick, but if we could, I'd pick you.”
Because
feels.
Recommended if:
- You want feels
- The Fault in Our Stars and Looking for Alaska were too sad
- You liked Boy Meets Boy
Not recommended if:
- You don't buy it when everyone is happy and loves each other
CLAMP
Why: It was so interesting I read it so
fast I hardly remember anything about it and I need to read it again
to know why exactly it was so great.
Recommended if:
- You already love the CLAMP-verse
- You don't mind it when they crush everything you thought you could still believe in
Not recommended if:
- You haven't read CLAMP before
- You only like Card Captor Sakura or Magic Knight Rayearth type of CLAMP
- CLAMP is already too confusing for you
- Wounds you got from any other CLAMP series are still easy to open
That's it. ^^'
No comments:
Post a Comment